Explaining Post-Soviet Patchworks Volume 1: Actors and Sectors in
Russia Between Accommodation and Resistance to Globalization / Ed.
by K. Segbers. London: Ashgate, 2001. 432 P.
Основанная на обширном исследовании
трилогия обеспечивает новые интерпретации постсоветских
преобразований, не придерживаясь традиционного предположения,
что Россия является уникальной страной. Используя мощные
аналитические инструменты, эта трилогия отмечает попадание стран
бывшего Советского Союза в поле зрения западной политической
науки.
Первый том сосредотачивается на государстве,
секторальных и транснациональных акторах. Он обеспечивает
достаточные данные, чтобы получить понимание логики действия
главных игроков в России.
Содержание тома
Actors and interests in a changing Russia,
Klaus Segbers;
International financial organizations and globalization
by default,
Ognian Hishow;
The origins and management of the federal debt to the
world,
Artos G. Sarkisiants;
Review by: David Lockwood
Slavic Review, Vol. 62, No. 2 (Summer, 2003), pp. 403-404
This book is part of the research project, "Transformation
and Globalization" and is the first of three volumes. As far as
I am aware, this project is fairly unique in attempting to
connect the ongoing transition in Russia both to the Soviet past
and to the global context in which the transition is taking
place. It therefore fills a gap in the literature—a most welcome
development in my view, since I would argue that the effect of
global factors on both the collapse of the Soviet Union and
subsequent developments have been far more important than most
analysts are prepared to concede. The book consists of a series
of individually authored chapters covering international
finance, large export-oriented corporations, mass media and
telecommunications, defense, agriculture, and particular groups
of actors (managers, small business, and the middle class). Most
of the chapters successfully relate their subject matter to the
Soviet past and to the effects of globalization.
At times however, despite the quality of individual chapters,
the book seems strangely disjointed. This is particularly the
case with regard to the editor's introduction in relation to the
rest of the book. The introduction informs us about the
necessity of "additional modifications of our state views;'
resulting for him (and presumably the research project) in a
"process . . . most appropriately . . . defined as a
'patchwork"' (6). This comes complete with one of those
confusing diagrams, which attempts to represent "networks,
flows, scapes" and so on (7). For the rest of the book, however,
the patchwork frame of reference seems to disappear, never to be
mentioned again. Similarly, the editor says that "the second
instrument we used for determining the interests, preferences
and strategies of actors [the first being the expert studies]
were [sic] expert polls" (ID). Sixty experts on the exercise of
power in Russia were asked to rate the power, the resources, and
the attitudes of different groups of influential actors
(thirty-two in all) for the years 1990, 1994, 1999, and 2004.
The editor goes into considerable detail on the poll results
(again, with diagrams). But once more, this instrument appears
in the introduction, and thereafter recedes from view. There is
no attempt to link either the patchwork concept or the poll
results with the separate studies that constitute the main part
of the book. This is a pity, since many of the expert
contributions could quite satisfactorily stand alone; if they
are to be drawn together in a volume such as this, then
generalizing concepts are needed. Unfortunately, they are set
out but not used. Naturally enough, the chapters vary somewhat
in how successfully their studies connect with
globalization—though it should be said that those on Gazprom,
Lukoil, and the mining and metals industry are especially good
in this regard.
The book takes a significant step toward redressing the
balance between internal and external factors in late and
post-Soviet developments. It would be even more interesting for
future studies to consider a third "variable," that of a deeper
history—that is to say, the effect of pre-Soviet (late tsarist)
legacies on subsequent periods.